The proof for why this is the only answer can easily be re-constructed for alternative basis. The part about how you can only have two digits in the sub-number applies to all basis n > 2. From there, the number is then uniquely determined to be 1 (n-2) 1 (n-2).
If the basis is n = 2, then the proof needs to be modified to state that there can be no more than three digits. But the number 1 0 1 0 still works, and by trial and error it can still be solved to show that there is no other answer.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2008-04-14 09:26 pm (UTC)If the basis is n = 2, then the proof needs to be modified to state that there can be no more than three digits. But the number 1 0 1 0 still works, and by trial and error it can still be solved to show that there is no other answer.
no subject
Date: 2008-04-14 09:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-04-15 02:08 pm (UTC)