Date: 2008-04-14 09:26 pm (UTC)
The proof for why this is the only answer can easily be re-constructed for alternative basis. The part about how you can only have two digits in the sub-number applies to all basis n > 2. From there, the number is then uniquely determined to be 1 (n-2) 1 (n-2).

If the basis is n = 2, then the proof needs to be modified to state that there can be no more than three digits. But the number 1 0 1 0 still works, and by trial and error it can still be solved to show that there is no other answer.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

rbandrews: (Default)
rbandrews

July 2024

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223242526 27
28293031   

Style Credit

Page generated Jul. 18th, 2025 12:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags