rbandrews: (Default)
rbandrews ([personal profile] rbandrews) wrote 2008-04-17 03:04 am (UTC)

I thought it was number of threads total. I might believe the 600 ones, but 180 seems awfully low.

Either that, or my other guess was number of spools of thread.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting